Monday 25 January 2021

How Access to Technology Affects WA Student Wellbeing in a Pandemic

By Alice Hall

Much of our daily lives have been impacted by the global pandemic of the Coronavirus.  Separate to developing and implementing new approaches to teaching and learning via digital platforms, many teachers have found themselves reflecting on their states of wellbeing and resilience as education professionals, not to mention the effect the last 12 months has had on our students.  As a result, our understanding of ‘wellbeing’ has arguably taken on new dimensions and played a different role in our lives of late. Previously, comfort, socialising and fun occurred in person, in community and in other physical social environments. Now, many of these elements are restricted, and technology is playing an increasingly bigger role in our lives (Gupta and Pathania 2020).

Technology can contribute through a myriad of ways to student learning and wellbeing, affecting engagement, progress and social interaction (Cheng and Chau 2009). Many different education technologies have been developed, including online forums such as Microsoft Teams, Firefly and Moodle, student websites including SchoolTube and creativity applications such as LifeForms (Parrish 2016). It is the Coronavirus pandemic, however, that has changed how we as educators use technological applications to support student learning, and indeed many educational platforms have increased and improved their provision throughout 2020. Burgeoning educational technologies available to educators such as Google Classroom are becoming increasingly important (Zhang 2016), and it could be argued that these platforms are used not just for student learning, but also for social interaction and well-being.

As part of the research for this article, over 50 students, teachers and members of the Senior Leadership Team (SLT) were surveyed at Westminster Academy. Many different thoughts and opinions about technology, wellbeing and the pandemic emerged, but what was a clear theme across all demographics was the issue of mental health, and how crucial effective management of our mental health is at this time. Members of SLT discussed concerns over student and staff mental health, teachers consistently referenced the importance of allowing for support of student mental health and wellbeing during lessons, and learners showed clear consideration of how their mental state and welfare is affected on a day-to-day basis.

It is clear that educators are considering how this increased access to technology can impact upon student wellbeing during the pandemic. Clearly new management of our wellbeing has arisen, so How can we use technology to help our wellbeing?

Teachers at WA are well aware of the increased knowledge needed to support student mental health and wellbeing in 2020. One teacher said it is necessary for educators to be “physically, mentally and emotionally healthy to do the job of teaching. This could mean having prepared and thought about the lesson deeply enough to execute it calmly and effectively… [things like] sufficient sleep, food and mental rest to regulate our emotions effectively and be able to manage and support a class of young people, are important at this time”. Another teacher stressed the need for educators to upskill, stating multiple things had helped her develop her practice across the pandemic, “Having the technology skills to be able to use the various mediums and resources, or the time to be able to upskill through training [is important]. The physical space and infrastructure to teach (quiet, desk, appropriate chair, reliable broadband et cetera)… and the mental capacity to be able to approach this with ingenuity, positivity, enthusiasm”. The physical demands of online teaching were also noted; “hours on Zoom is not good for the eyes, head or back!”. Students also offered their opinions on what it meant for teachers to be fit for practice at this time, with one student stating “it really does depend on which student you ask. Personally, I think live online lessons is probably the best for supporting the wellbeing for students (to some extent)”.

There are, of course, benefits to increased access and provision of technology to support our students and their wellbeing (Gupta and Pathania 2020). One member of SLT wrote of the sense of community they felt when seeing over 100 students on a Zoom call, and of the benefits to their wellbeing the continued sense of structure offered. There are challenges to providing this provision, such as the reticence of students to turn cameras on during Zoom calls, but overall the belief was held that this act of community, bringing learners together through technology, supported the wellbeing of students and made them feel as though they were not alone whilst in isolation. Other educators and members of SLT also agreed upon the benefits online events and performances could offer, stating “Online physical activities have also helped with students’ health… Last year I also arranged for instrumental lessons to continue to support with the students’ wellbeing.” Additionally, “some students thrive in an independent learning setting, particularly those that feel confident using digital tools and are highly competent computer users. Many enjoy the ability to work at their own pace and have a high degree of anonymity (e.g., doing work and asking questions without potential embarrassment from their peers). Online opportunities can enable access to cool interactive opportunities and have an element of community in the ability to collaborate easily with others. However, I feel many students still feel isolated and sometimes online opportunities heightens their sense of feeling alone when they’re at their laptop and know they can’t always be seen or heard”.

Overall, there was a sense that online activities added value for young people learning from home, and many different teachers and members of SLT alike noted the positive elements of routine, social interaction and a sense of purpose they offered, “online school has allowed me to shift my attention from the bad things that are happening during the pandemic” and “it lets me focus on things other than Covid-19 or the pandemic which is good for my mental health”. Others also noted the power of a friendly face; and spoke of the impact simply seeing their peers and teachers on a regular basis has for wellbeing. 

There are also many challenges to provisions offered online during the pandemic, and no doubt many of us have experienced these first-hand. Members of SLT spoke of the challenges to student reading comprehension levels when teaching online as well as encouragement of learners with low self-esteem. One teacher spoke of how challenging they found it to differentiate during their lessons, noting that “it is difficult to differentiate online because we just do not have that face to face contact; we cannot check for misconceptions easily and we cannot check students are focusing on the work and trying hard. I think we should accept it is never going to be perfect online, however I do [think] that consistency with lessons, well-planned lessons, regular feedback and high expectations are imperative to ensure all students remain engaged.” WA students themselves were also keenly aware of the challenges of utilising technology and online classes for learning: “online school generally felt like a blur…we have missed out on so much school which has caused us to fall behind”. Conversely, students surveyed were aware of the importance to the wellbeing of the community as a whole. One GCSE student wrote “I think it’s good we are not going [to school] as it’s better to save lives rather than give kids education in person. Online lessons at least are somewhat effective”.

Overall, most members of the WA staff body surveyed were keen to make the best of the situation, provide as high a quality of instruction to learners as possible and safeguard student wellbeing and mental health. Accessing trained mental health professionals was listed as vital from several respondents, as well as online based opportunities such as dance lessons, online sessions and exercise clubs. Teachers consistently spoke of the need to be able to adapt to the current situation and develop their existing skills in an online medium (Zhang 2016). One educator said they liked that there was a “huge development in the confidence of staff in utilising digital teaching tools… An increase in risk-taking from staff, forced to try out new things or to rethink routines or styles of teaching which cannot be easily replicated online, and a greater willingness to share practice and ideas, irrespective of experience level”.

It was clear across the staff surveyed that student wellbeing was at the heart of their priorities when moving their classes online, and the mental health and wellbeing of young people was expressly stated as a key factor of online provision offered. Recommendations included to “have small group or one to one chats so they feel more supported personally or have an opportunity to talk more informally. Support for how to manage their time and mental health in lockdown that is more hands on, having students do online workshops which are more practical e.g., cooking, exercise, anything physical to help them get away from just typing”. Another recommendation given was to focus on students’ sense of wellbeing; “Teachers and students, we all have to learn to move forward within the current teaching context of Covid-19, so that when everything opens up, we don’t necessarily go back to where we are”. Other suggestions to support student wellbeing included “I think personal response really helps, sharing your day and how you're feeling; allowing students to realise that they're not alone. I do think more can be done on this e.g., one TTB a week where you're able to just chat/go into breakout rooms as they would in the [physical] classroom.” WA students also had clear opinions on how they would like to proceed moving forward in these uncertain times: “I guess to just understand that people (especially teens) are more likely to be stressed and not really in a good mental state while being forced to stay at home so to just be mindful of that… I fear that this new normal [will] become a literal normal”.

However, it was the words of one member of SLT that rang true when considering the needs of young people’s mental health and wellbeing at this time: “[I just want to give] reassurance that everything will be ok”.


Reference List

  • Cheng, Gary, and Juliana Chau. ‘Digital Video for Fostering Self‐reflection in an ePortfolio Environment’. Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, 2009, pp. 337–350.
  • Gupta, Adit, and Pathania, Pooja. ‘To Study the Impact of Google Classroom as a Platform of Learning and Collaboration at the Teacher Education Level’. Education and Information Technologies, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-15.
  • Parrish, Mila. ‘Toward Transformation: Digital Tools for Online Dance Pedagogy’. Arts Education Policy Review, vol. 117, no. 3, 2016, pp. 168–182.
  • United Kingdom Government. Guidance for full opening: Schools. https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications/actions-for-schools-during-the-coronavirus-outbreak/guidance-for-full-opening-schoolAccessed 3 Jan 2021.
  • Zhang, Michael. Teaching with Google Classroom. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2016.


Bitesize Research: Teacher Leadership and Student Achievement - what's the deal?

In the fourth week in T3, when we are looking at leadership values for T&L evaluation, I wanted to share with you a meta-analysis from the Educational Research Review about the association of teacher leadership and student achievement, published in November 2020.


Objectives: There is a lot of literature around teacher leadership. However, unlike most of the existing literature, this analysis seeks to establish an empirical basis for whether or not teacher leadership impacts student achievement. For this analysis, teacher leadership is defined as those who maintain normal classroom responsibilities as well as assuming leadership responsibilities outside of the classroom. This can be formally (by way of a leadership post) or informally (demonstrating those leadership behaviours). 


Summary:  

  • Overall, there is a small positive correlation between teacher leadership and student achievement.

  • There appears to be a slightly higher impact of teacher leadership on Maths achievement, rather than reading achievement, although both are positively impacted.

  • Teachers involved with curriculum, instruction (classroom pedagogy) and assessment decisions demonstrated the strongest relationships with student achievement. 

  • This meta-analysis uses some studies with small sample sizes. This suggests that whilst this is a good start, further work to show the empirical basis for the relationship between teacher leadership and student achievement needs to be conducted.


How does this impact me and my practice?: Some reflection questions arising from this that might be helpful to consider are: 

 

  • How do I show leadership as a teacher, either formally or informally? What are my areas of strength, and areas for development?

  • What does curriculum, instruction and assessment leadership involve? How do leaders in these areas think and make decisions? How can I show these leadership qualities?

If anyone would like to discuss this further with Jaya - please do comment below! I’d be delighted to open up these discussions and conversations.

Tuesday 19 January 2021

Bitesize Research: The KS3 Years and Disadvantaged Children



The third week in T3, I wanted to share with you the work of the Nuffield Foundation on disadvantage in early secondary education (KS3 in the traditional sense of YR7 to YR9) published in December 2020.


Objectives: To examine what, if any, impact the KS3 years have on attainment and progress for disadvantaged children. They looked at lots of factors, but most notably ones connected to family income and attendance.




Summary:  

  • There is significant evidence to suggest that a number of educational inequalities widen between disadvantaged children and their peers across KS3. This includes attendance, attainment and progress worsening for disadvantaged children across KS3.

  • The gaps in students’ self-reported outcomes also widen, particularly pertaining to attitudes towards school, perception of academic ability, aspirations for careers and further education.

  • Identifying and supporting higher prior attaining disadvantage students on entry to secondary school made a difference in creating higher GCSE attainment 


How does this impact me and my practice?: Some reflection questions arising from this that might be helpful to consider are: 

 

  • Do I know who my disadvantaged students in KS3 are? Do I know who my higher prior attaining disadvantaged students in KS3 are too? If not, how do I find this out?

  • How can we support KS3 students to mitigate against some of these widening inequalities from YR7-9?

  • How can we work to improve student self-perception across KS3? What has worked well? What could we try differently?

If anyone would like to discuss this further with Jaya - please do comment below! I’d be delighted to open up these discussions and conversations.

Sunday 17 January 2021

"Show me the Way": The importance of feedback in the plan-teach-assess cycle

By Dr Paul Wood

[Note: This short blog post is part of my efforts to share my educational thinking. Nothing below should be interpreted as a comment on WA teaching since I've yet to observe that in practice].

Assessment is one of the most important tools to help a teacher maximise each individual student's learning. I continue to find it a fascinating topic, not only because of its aforementioned importance, but also for reasons such as:
  • the wide range in philosophical attitudes towards it (what is its purpose?!)
  • the controversies that it generates (E.g. should students be able to resubmit assessments? What if students miss a deadline?)
  • the ways in which it is used to inform grade determination (most
  • the anxieties that it can cause students if they (or their parents) believe their grades are not good enough.  
Effective use of diagnostic, formative and summative assessments is vital but depends on a shared understanding within each class and across a faculty of how those assessment types best support the plan-teach-assess cycle (see page 18 of the WA Best Practice Handbook). Such a shared understanding helps ensure a consistency in the student experience: I have no doubt that it benefits students to hear consistent language about, and have consistent experiences of, assessment (and hence grading) and other important aspects of teaching and learning.

The simple "plan-teach-assess" cycle could be expanded to "diagnostically assess-plan-teach-formatively assess-feedback to students-plan-teach-summatively assess"!  The role of feedback in this expanded cycle is crucial and this article, while a little old, usefully summarises what is required for feedback to be meaningful.  However, there's little value in a teacher taking the time to provide meaningful feedback if students do not understand it and act on it.  Hence, the importance of using some classroom time to ensure that's the case.

My own thinking about assessment has been informed by the work of many people including those listed below.  Anyone who is interested in assessment might like to explore their work and opinions, but it's always important to think critically about pedagogical research, trends and "theories"!


I welcome your suggestions of other people who have worthwhile things to say about assessment.

Tuesday 12 January 2021

Bitesize Research: Best Practice for Remote Learning

The second week in T3, I wanted to share with you the work of the Education Endowment Fund on Remote Learning



Objectives: In the first lockdown, the EEF aimed to synthesise existing studies that were relevant to remote learning to give advice on what best practices might support learning online. Whilst the findings are helpful, the EEF are keen to stress that the studies examined were not done within the same context as the COVID-19 pandemic, which means that use of professional judgement with remote learning still remains highly important.


Summary:  They found the following key tenets were common threads in the studies examined on remote learning:

1. Teacher quality is more important than how lessons are delivered

  • Ensuring normal elements of teacher effectiveness e.g. clear explanations, scaffolding and feedback is essential

  • There was no difference between teaching in real time, or teaching ‘asynchronously’ - what mattered most was how explanations built on previous learning and how pupil understanding was assessed thereafter

2. Peer interactions can provide motivation and improve learning

  • Things such as peer marking and feedback, sharing and collaboration on model answers were found to be helpful across a number of studies.

3. Supporting students to be able to work independently was helpful

  • Providing strategies that linked to metacognition was helpful across a number of studies

4. Different approaches to remote learning suit different content and tasks

  • For example, games for learning were helpful in MFL, but much less helpful in other subjects.

  • Similarly using technology to support retrieval practice and self-quizzing can help, but this is not a replacement for other forms of assessment


How does this impact me and my practice?: Some reflection questions arising from this that might be helpful to consider are: 

 

  • How can I impactfully sequence learning to ensure that online lessons build on each other successfully?

  • How can I ensure that I can facilitate peer interactions in WA Online?

  • What practices can be put into place to support students with metacognitions and independent learning processes?

  • What different tasks are best suited to my subject, the content I am teaching, and the skills I want the students to develop?

If anyone would like to discuss this further with Jaya - please comment below! I’d be delighted to open up these discussions and conversations.

Monday 11 January 2021

T&L Activity: How confident are you that your answer is correct?

By Ruhina Cockar


Picture a student who is so confident in their answer, you pick on them to answer in front of the class, and they give you an incorrect answer. Why was the student so confident?


How can you train students to think about their level of confidence in their answers?

It’s a skill I know Historians use in their pedagogy - asking students how sure are they in the validity of the argument put forward or the source they are analysing - can this be transferred to other subjects?


An activity I recently observed a member of staff do was a Confidence-Weighted True/False Task, which I was really inspired by and transferred to a maths context to talk you through it. 


What is the activity?


I shared a google doc with this table of statements on google classroom as an assignment:


Q

Statement

True/False

Reason for answer

Confidence 

(out of 5 where 5 is very confident)

1

The general form of an equation of a straight line is 

y = mx + c




2

The gradient is a numerical value of where the graph crosses the y-intercept




3

m represents the y-intercept, c represents the gradient of the line




4

I cannot find the equation of a straight line given a gradient and one coordinate point




5

I can find the equation of the line given two coordinate points




6

A straight line graph is called a quadratic graph 




7

Parallel lines have the same gradient and different y-intercepts





I gave students 10-15 minutes to work through this independently.


I then used this as an opportunity to do some assessment for learning and self-assessment simultaneously. I asked students to show me whether they wrote true or false and their confidence level on a mini whiteboard. I then picked on different students to explain their answers (you could pick someone with a high confidence level and a wrong answer, low confidence level and a correct answer). Students then either corrected their answers or added detail to them in green font.


We went through each statement with this process.


Here’s an example of a HPA student’s corrected version of the table:


Q

Statement

True/False

Reason for answer

Confidence 

(out of 5 where 5 is very confident)

1

The general form of an equation of a straight line is 

y = mx + c

True

The general equation of a straight line is y = mx + c, where m is the gradient, and y = c is the value where the line cuts the y-axis. This number c is called the intercept on the y-axis. A linear graph where the gradient is content - for everyone along, you go up. X has the power of 1.

5

2

The gradient is a numerical value of where the graph crosses the y-intercept

False

the gradient is the numerical measure of the steepness of a straight line

4

3

m represents the y-intercept, c represents the gradient of the line

False

C represents the y-intercept

5

4

I cannot find the equation of a straight line given a gradient and one coordinate point

False

You can do this by substituting the gradient and the coordinate into y=mx+c

3

5

I can find the equation of the line given two coordinate points

True

You can find the gradient using the difference in y divided by the difference in x coordinates, then substitute in a coordinate to find the y intercept.

5

6

A straight-line graph is called a quadratic graph 

False

A straight-line graph is in the form of y = mx + c and is a simple straight line whereas a quadratic function is one of the form y = ax2 + bx + c and has a U-shaped curve. A straight line graph is called a linear graph.

4

7

Parallel lines have the same gradient and different y-intercepts

True

Lines that are parallel have different y-intercepts 

This is because in order to be parallel you need to have the same steepness/angle

5


You will notice that this student felt confident in their true/false answer but was not as articulate in their reasoning - does this show the depth of understanding expected from this student?


Why you should try this activity


  • It encourages reasoning and develops students literacy skills

  • It encourages students to think in depth to be able to give a suitably detailed answer

  • All students were engaged and felt encouraged to answer questions as they had already shown their confidence in their answer (i.e. that it was low) 

  • Could link this to retrieval practice by making it a low stakes assessment a few weeks after teaching a topic


Other ways of approaching this activity:


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1475725715605627



It would be great to see your versions of this activity so do share them with me - I’d love to link your examples in here as an update!


Further Reading 


Correlating Student Knowledge and Confidence Using a Graded Knowledge Survey to Assess Student Learning in a General Microbiology Classroom