Friday, 14 February 2025

Maximising Learning Time - Every Minute Matters!

By George Ghaffari

In this blogpost we’re going to think about how we can maximise learning time at Westminster Academy through the principle of ‘Every Minute Matters’ (Teach Like A Champion, 2010).


The principle is very simple, and self-explanatory! As teachers, we understand how important every minute of learning is for students and therefore, in short, when practicing Every Minute Matters, we are respecting our, and the students’, time by making each minute as productive as possible.

As Doug Lemov explains, if we let students “relax” for just the last 5 minutes of every class for 6 classes in each school year, we are giving up 75 hours of valuable learning time. This 5 minutes can be lost in many other ways too; giving students too much time for activities, ‘off topic’ conversations, disruptive behaviour, prolonged teacher talk - the list goes on.

We already have a number of systems and rules in place at WA that support maximising learning time. For example, students use the bathroom at break or lunch, in order to not miss lesson time. Similarly, students are expected to enter the classroom and start the aptly named ‘Do Now’. As Ruhina wrote, in her last T&L blog, ‘the language of “Do Now” as opposed to “starter” is deliberate to promote a sense of urgency - students begin the work straight away, reducing idle time and maximising the time on the task and their learning’.  

One of my favourite parts of Lemov’s chapter on this is as follows:

Mastering Every Minute Matters means spending time with the greatest possible productivity by attending to the everyday moments when time is often squandered. It means assuming that events will forever create new and unanticipated opportunities for downtime to occur, and therefore being prepared with “back-pocket” activities: a high-energy review of what your students have learned, or a challenge problem. It means keeping a series of short learning activities ready so that you’re prepared when downtime threatens . . . . You can, in short, always be teaching. (p. 226)

I like to think of the ‘back-pocket activities’ more as a ‘bag of tricks’ that we can develop as teachers to deal with these ‘everyday moments when time is squandered’. During my first year in schools as an LSA, it was these tricks that always impressed me the most when observing teachers. It was watching these strategies in action, creating pacy, dynamic and purposeful lessons even with the most challenging students, that inspired me to go into the profession. 

So, what do some of these strategies look like? How can we employ in the classroom to maximise learning? How can we ensure that every minute, truly does, matter?


  1. Pacing - ‘Brighten Lines’


Learning time is often lost between activities in class for a number of reasons; students taking time to ‘get going’, taking time to stop and move onto the next task, sticking in sheets, to name a few. We know that ensuring lessons are pacy and dynamic is key to cutting out this ‘dead time’. ‘Brightening Lines' is a technique to ensure changes in activities  are perceived clearly by making beginnings and endings of activities visible and crisp (TLAC, 2010). The use of countdowns is vital for this. Not only do they give students (and us!) breathing space, they create a constant sense of pace and purpose in the classroom.


There are a number of ways that we can ‘Brighten Lines’, I have included some of the ones I find most helpful below:


  • Transitioning between activities quickly and smoothly - “In 30 seconds we will have pens down, revision guides open at page 32, ready to read the first paragraph. 20 seconds, finishing the last sentence. 10 seconds all pens should be down, revision guides opening….”


  • Building excitement and motivation for learning - “20 seconds make sure you have finished your CFU task so we can be ready to tackle a GCSE exam question”. Consider this in relation to - “20 seconds you need to be finished the task. Okay now let’s do the next task”. What might be the impact on students?



  1. Building Ratio


Maximising learning time can also be achieved by increasing the ratio of active student engagement to passive instruction. According to Hattie’s research on visible learning (2009), active learning strategies such as group discussions and problem-based learning lead to higher academic achievement. These strategies encourage students to engage with the content directly, applying their knowledge in real-world contexts, rather than passively receiving information. By shifting from teacher-centered to student-centered instruction, we can improve retention and understanding, thus maximising learning time and improving learning outcomes (Freeman et al., 2014). 


Two helpful strategies for building ratio:


  • Think-Write-Pair-Share - Consider the start of a lesson, once the Do Now has finished. The teacher goes into their exposition, explaining the learning objectives, why the topic is important, misconceptions around it, and starts to model. This may take anywhere between 5-10 minutes. What is the ‘thinking ratio’ like in the room during this time? Some students may be listening, some may have switched off, very few will be learning.


A ‘Think-Write-Pair-Share’ or ‘hook’ task involves asking students a mixture of close and open-ended questions that allow them to explore the central concept of the lesson, connect it to previous learning and relate it to their own lives. Feedback allows the teacher to address any misconceptions, and learning is maximised by shifting the ratio in favour of the students.

Examples


  1. Positive and Deliberate Reframing - Quick Win 5!


Disruption-free learning maximises valuable learning time by minimising interruptions, allowing students to fully engage with the material. When challenges arise, deliberately reframing them as opportunities for growth helps students stay motivated and focused. Rather than being discouraged, students are encouraged to approach difficulties with a problem-solving mindset. This positive reframing enables them to overcome obstacles efficiently, keeping the flow of learning intact and making the most of every moment in the classroom. 


Consider these everyday challenges we face in the classroom and how we can reframe them.


“Can I use the toilet/Can I use a timeout?”

“Can I see what you’ve written first? I was really impressed with your ideas in the discussion earlier”

“I need to talk to you about something that happened at break”

“Sounds important, can we catch up at the end of the lesson? I wanted to hear your thoughts on this question” 


Reflective Questions for you:


  1. How do I ensure that every minute of my lesson is spent effectively, and what strategies can I use to reduce any "downtime" or wasted time in the classroom?

  2. In what ways can I make transitions between activities clearer and more engaging for students, ensuring that they stay focused and motivated throughout the lesson?

  3. How can I increase the active engagement of my students during lessons, moving from passive instruction to more interactive, student-centred strategies?

  4. Am I prepared with “back-pocket activities” to use when unexpected downtime arises in the classroom? What types of activities could I have ready to keep students on task?

  5. How can I balance the amount of teacher talk with opportunities for student thinking and collaboration, ensuring that students are consistently involved in their learning process?


Sources:

  • Lemov, D. (2010). Teach Like a Champion

  • Hattie, J. (2010) Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement

  • Freeman et al. (2014) Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics


Tuesday, 11 February 2025

Classroom Oracy: The Key to Unlocking Potential

By Najiyah Rahman

Analytical questions plague all aspects of the English Curriculum and students are required from time to time to show this skill, but are they engaged in doing so? This last term I set out to change my practice as I had identified a key concern in my Year 11 class, which is a lack of fluency in analytical writing. My students know the basics of writing and have knowledge of the text but are not incorporating this knowledge in their writing consistently. My results from Inquiry 1 show that students prefer classroom oracy as a method of engagement.  It was also identified that they find structuring their answers difficult. 


In this inquiry, I will discuss how removing PEEL/PEE writing frameworks for paragraph writing in exchange for thinking frameworks like WHAT HOW WHY allowed my students to better structure their work and discussions. I aim to understand the correlation between using an optimal engagement tool (as identified via student voice) and improved performance in analytical writing tasks.


What did I do?
I had introduced debate and discussion lessons based on an exam question. We followed this format for other lessons leading up to the exam however below is an example: I wanted to hone in on Shakespeare’s purpose as a lot of their analytical paragraphs lacked in this area. They were able to make points and provide evidence but not explain why these choices were made. The aim of this task was to equip them with several different reasons as to why Shakespeare made particular choices. 

Students had 5 minutes to plan in groups on their tables. They needed to make three points. The way I had guided their discussions was through the WHAT HOW WHY thinking frameworks which I made explicit on the slide below. I made it clear that the screen was there for support but they could use the framework to shape their thoughts individually. 



Group 1 and Group 2 had three tables each. After the 5 minutes were up, they had 2 minutes to discuss their answers with the other two other tables and find the strongest point that each of them would argue. 


When the debate started, all students had to write notes from each point each table discussed. At the end of the discussion, students were given 3 minutes to order their 6 points and answer the debate questions. 


After they had written their responses, a student asked “This isn’t an exam question, how do we apply this to the exam?” to which I had responded, “You all identified that debates and discussion engages you the most, all of you identified you found structure difficult and all of you were unable to explain your points in detail. This task has allowed you to use a new thinking framework to answer any question, it has also provided you with 6 different points about Shakespeare’s purpose which you can apply to EVERY question!


How did I measure it?

I measured feedback via student voice, pre-existing and new mock data and observations to triangulate my data.


  1. My primary source of data came from the mocks comparing what they achieved in the autumn pre-mocks and the winter mocks. Here is the table below:

Grades

Autumn Mocks

Winter Mocks

Below 4

52% 

43%

9-4

48% 

57%

9-5

39% 

39%

9-7

26% 

22%

The table shows the distribution of grades in Autumn and Winter Mocks. Here's a comparison:


  • Below 4: The percentage of students scoring below 4 decreased from 52% in Autumn Mocks to 43% in Winter Mocks. This indicates an improvement in overall performance.

  • 9-4: The percentage of students achieving grades 9-4 increased from 48% in Autumn Mocks to 57% in Winter Mocks. This suggests a significant improvement in the higher-achieving band.

  • 9-5: The percentage of students scoring 9-5 remained consistent at 39% in both Autumn and Winter Mocks. This suggests that the proportion of students in this range remained relatively stable.

  • 9-7: The percentage of students achieving grades 9-7 decreased from 26% in Autumn Mocks to 22% in Winter Mocks. This might indicate a slight decline in the top-performing group.


Overall, the data suggests a positive trend with a decrease in the percentage of students scoring below 4 and an increase in the percentage of students achieving grades 9-4. 


However, a slight decline is observed in the top-performing group (9-7). This may have been due to external factors such as revision and time-management (which a lot of them had informed me of after their exams). 


  1. My second piece of data collection was through observations. I had seen a significant improvement in engagement, comments like “Miss, that was a fun lesson!” and “I’ve learnt a lot today!” and all students were able to write significantly more than what they previously were able to do. 


I am awaiting books to photograph evidence of this*


  1. And my third piece of data, I am still awaiting student feedback via survey. 


Below are the questions from the survey:
Student Survey: Impact of Debates/Discussion on Analytical Writing


How engaged did you find yourself during these discussions/debates?

a) Not at all engaged

b) Slightly engaged

c) Moderately engaged

d) Very engaged


To what extent do you believe participating in discussions/debates helped you to: Understand the different perspectives on the topic?

1 (Strongly Disagree) - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 (Strongly Agree)


To what extent do you believe participating in discussions/debates helped you to:
Develop your own arguments?

1 (Strongly Disagree) - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 (Strongly Agree)


To what extent do you believe participating in discussions/debates helped you to:
Identify and analyse evidence to support your arguments?

1 (Strongly Disagree) - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 (Strongly Agree)


To what extent do you believe using the WHAT HOW WHY thinking framework helped you to: Structure your written responses to analytical questions?

1 (Strongly Disagree) - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 (Strongly Agree)


To what extent do you believe participating in discussions/debates helped you to:
Improve your use of language and vocabulary in your writing?

1 (Strongly Disagree) - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 (Strongly Agree)


Overall, how helpful do you think class discussions/debates and thinking frameworks were in preparing you for writing analytical essays?

a) Not helpful at all

b) Slightly helpful

c) Moderately helpful

d) Very helpful


Do you have any other comments or suggestions regarding the use of debates in class?

(Provide space for open-ended written responses)


So what were the challenges?  

There were many challenges I had encountered: 


  1. Maintaining Focus: While the initial enthusiasm for debates was high, sustaining student engagement proved to be a challenge after a while. Some students, particularly those less confident in their speaking abilities, tended to disengage or become passive listeners.

  2. Differentiation: Ensuring all students, regardless of their confidence levels, had an equal opportunity to participate and contribute to the debates was challenging. Some students dominated the discussions, while others remained silent and it was hard to force them to talk.

  3. Activity Time Management: Incorporating frequent discussion into the lesson required careful planning and time management as often I had found we ran out of time to get to writing.

  4. Assessing Participation: Accurately assessing individual student contributions within the dynamic context of a debate presented a challenge.

  5. Revision:  While the debates improved student understanding of the text and helped them generate ideas, some students still struggled with effectively revising the scheme of work/what they had learnt about the text prior/forgot key moments of the text etc.

  6. Individual Time Management: Students still had difficulties with time management during the writing process and being able to finish an answer within the allotted time. 


What are my key takeaways?

My 5 key takeaways from this inquiry were: 


  1. The positive impact of classroom oracy: The initial data analysis suggests that classroom debates, when effectively implemented, can significantly enhance student engagement and improve performance in analytical writing tasks.


  1. The importance of scaffolding and support: Providing clear structures, such as thinking frameworks (WHAT? HOW? WHY?), and explicit guidance can help students navigate the debate process and maximise their learning.


  1. The need for ongoing evaluation and adjustment: I need to continue to refine my approach to classroom debates, addressing the challenges identified and exploring new strategies to enhance student participation and learning.


  1. The importance of addressing individual needs: I need to implement strategies to ensure all students have an equal opportunity to participate and contribute to the debates, such as peer-to-peer support and differentiated questioning techniques.


  1. The need for continued focus on revision strategies: I will need to provide more explicit instruction and support for students in the revision process, including strategies for time management and effective use of feedback.


Thank you for taking the time to read my blogpost! Feel free to share your comments and thoughts at n.rahman@westminsteracademy.org.uk