Tuesday, 24 June 2025

Autism in the Classroom

By Corinna Matlis


The rates of autism diagnoses are going up across the UK.  While this has sparked a fair amount of controversy about whether the cause lies in changing diagnosis criteria or something else, the reality is that we have more and more students in our classrooms who are autistic and/or identify as autistic or neurodivergent. Therefore, it is important that we think carefully about how we are supporting those students.  In this blogpost, I’m going to suggest that many of the ways we are already supporting autistic students are in line with best practice, and so we should double-down on them.  At the same time, I will suggest that we think carefully about how we understand and talk about autistic pupils so that we can move away from deficit and medicalised language.  Throughout this blogpost, I will refer to autistic people and neurodivergent people.  These are not synonyms – neurodivergence is a bigger basket that includes people who have ADHD, dyslexia, dyspraxia, OCD, and other conditions.  It is common for neurodivergent people to have co-occurring conditions and many practices that support autistic students will also support other neurodivergent students.  


In the interest of full transparency, I have delved into this topic this year in part because of the high number of students with autism diagnoses on my registers. The other reason for my delving into this topic, however, is that a close relative received an autism diagnosis last summer, and I also, at the age of thirty-seven, received a working diagnosis for both autism and dyspraxia. (I’m still on the waiting list to be assessed for a formal diagnosis).  This topic is therefore personal to me, but I believe that this motivates me to think more deeply about what kind of adaptations are truly helpful. Also, as a neurodivergent teacher, I have limited space in my cognitive load to make massive adaptations and will therefore advocate for rethinking practices that we are already doing that help students and don’t overload teachers. 


Thinking about Autism Differently

Before thinking about ways to support autistic students in the classroom, it is worth rethinking how we view autism.  The rise in diagnosis has been accompanied by a wider understanding of what autism is and how autistic people may present.  The ‘Double Empathy Problem’ is a particularly powerful reframing of autism. While traditionally autistic people have been viewed as having poor social skills and even lacking in empathy, in 2012, the scholar Damian Milton, who is autistic, postulated that the issue is not that autistic people lack empathy but rather that the understanding breaks down between autistic and neurotypical people to such an extent that each one can view the other as lacking in empathy. His argument, therefore, is that the path forward is for all of us to try to learn about and understand each other better.  


Many of us are used to thinking of autism as a spectrum.  While this is useful in that it makes clear that every autistic person’s experience is not the same, it actually does not capture the wide variety of autistic experience along different modalities that can be dialled up or down.  Some examples of these modalities might be sensory processing differences, social differences, different styles of communication, executive functioning differences etc..  Different people may have different levels of support needs (autistic people prefer to speak about ‘high levels of support needs’ rather than ‘severe autism.’)  Some autistic people may ‘mask’ more than others, even to themselves, and this may mean that support needs are not apparent or that the person’s intellectual or emotional capacity varies depending on how tired they are from masking.  (As a personal example, one of the modalities that shows up most strongly for me is sensory differences, but I tried to ignore those differences for most of my life and just muscle through.  This led me to feel pretty exhausted fairly regularly.)  


Although the official language in the DSM-5 and ICD-11 refers to ‘Autism Spectrum Disorder,’ most autistic people prefer to avoid using the word ‘disorder’ when talking about autism. Advocacy groups, such as the National Autistic Society, explain that autistic people prefer simply to be called ‘autistic’, and we should avoid saying that someone ‘has autism’ in order to de-medicalise the language we use on a day-to-day basis.   In his book, Uniquely Human, Barry Prizant was one of the first scholars to lay out the idea that autism should be seen as a difference rather than a deficit. Autistic or neurodivergent people have strengths and weaknesses just like anyone else.  The difference is that those strengths and weaknesses tend to fall in different patterns than those of neurotypical people.  Some people do have higher support needs than others, and it may be that some pupils need more explicit support than what I will advocate for here, but the strategies here will support everyone at least to some extent. 


Standard Adaptations with a Different Attitude

Below are four practices that are standard in how we teach at WA and especially in how we support SEN students. It would be helpful, however, to understand exactly how and why these practices are especially important for autistic and other neurodivergent people.  Thinking through this will allow us to focus on making these practices more effective. 

  1. Lesson Outlines:  An important priority for teachers with neurodivergent pupils is to give them a sense of where they are in the lesson. (Huma advocated for this in her CPD presented to departments in Term 5!) This can be done verbally or, even better, visually in the slides, but it does not need to be complicated. An overview at the beginning can be helpful, but more important is to remind the pupils consistently of where they are in the lesson and where they are going next. I have included an example of this from a Y7 history lesson below. The slide is very simple, and it is repeated throughout the lesson with different lines bolded, depending on where we are in the lesson. The reason this is so helpful is that neurodivergent people tend to process information in different ways, often in greater detail than neurotypical people. That means it is easy to get lost in the weeds and it can be very helpful to have a framework.  

  1. Chunking Information and Having Opportunities to Practice:  This suggestion is entirely in line with the new WA Pillars of Teaching and Learning, including the suggested lesson outlines. Everyone, neurotypical or neurodivergent, learns better when we are given a reasonable amount of new knowledge or information to digest and then a chance to practice it.  Neurodivergent pupils, however, learn best when given multiple different ways to process information. 

  2. Modelling Language: This is also a staple of teaching and not something that needs to be specifically adapted for neurodivergent pupils. Autistic pupils in particular, however, may interact with models slightly differently than others. Almost all autistic people are Gestalt Language Processors. GLPs process language more easily in chunks than as individual words. This is particularly relevant in early life when we are acquiring language but can remain relevant into adulthood.  This means that an autistic student may directly incorporate a model phrase into their speech or writing and reproduce it later as well.  (This is called ‘delayed echolalia.’)  For decades, this repetition was considered evidence that autistic people do not understand language well, but researcher Marge Blanc demonstrated that this is actually part of a process of deciphering language that can not only be a very effective form of communication but also eventually leads to creation of unique language and phrases.  

  3. Group Work and Executive Function: All of the practices I’ve discussed above are part of a teacher’s standard toolkit and are also part of the standard toolkit for teaching neurodivergent students. For my PLC this year, I’ve also tried another technique that is not as commonly associated with supporting neurodivergent students – group work. My results were mixed, as I will explain below, but it is worth remembering that structured group work fits with the suggestion that neurodivergent students often thrive when given many different ways to learn. The EEF suggests that working in groups can help support children who struggle with executive function – one of the biggest challenges for those of us who are neurodivergent because of the overwhelming amount of information we are processing. In my Year 7 history class, I structured a unit on Tudor England around group work. The structure and roles for the group work were the same for three consecutive weeks, and this gave students the chance to get used to the process (they were reading about different people who lived in Tudor England and finding similarities and differences between their lives). Ultimately, the classwork and final assessment did show an improvement for many of the students, autistic or not, from previous terms. However, a student voice survey revealed that the students did not feel that the group work had helped them understand the unit. I don’t think that group work is a silver bullet to support autistic and neurodivergent students, but it does belong in our toolkit as a different way to practice skills. 


Final Thoughts

With more and more pupils coming to WA with autism diagnoses, it is important that we have a clear understanding of the many complexities of autism and other forms of neurodivergence. I believe the easiest way for teachers to make adaptations to support most neurodivergent students is if we teach lessons as normal but keep in mind the ways certain techniques may specifically help autistic and other neurodivergent students so as to make sure those practices are prioritised.  It is also important to keep in mind that we should see autism as a difference and avoid using language like ‘deficit’, ‘disorder’, or ‘dysfunction’ whenever possible.  


Notes/Sources


1  This is one of many news stories talking about the rise in diagnoses and the questions around what is driving them:  Autism diagnoses are on the rise – but autism itself may not be, last accessed 23 June, 2025.  


2 Damian Milton,“On the Ontological Status of Autism: The ‘Double Empathy Problem.’” Disability & Society 27 (6): 883–87. 


3  For an example of this kind of explanation for autism, see Claire Jack, ‘From Autistic Linear Spectrum to Pie Chart Spectrum: Is it time to think of autism as a wheel, rather than a line?’ in Psychology Today, https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/women-autism-spectrum-disorder/202208/autistic-linear-spectrum-pie-chart-spectrum, last accessed 24 June, 2025.  


4  The National Autistic Society has this really helpful PDF that explains the best ways to talk about autism and autistic people:  ‘How do Talk and Write about Autism Guide.’  https://nas.chorus.thirdlight.com/file/24/w2nAKE4w2MLxnl9w2LQ-w1l_8C/How%20to%20talk%20and%20write%20about%20autism%20guide%20-%20June%202025.pdf , last accessed 23 June 2025.  


5  Barry Prizant with T Field-Meyers, (2015) Uniquely Human: A Different Way of Seeing Autism. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. 


6  For an introduction to neurodivergence that is also wonderfully accessible for young people, try: Louise Gooding, (2023) Wonderfully Wired Brains:  An Introduction to the World of Neurodiversity.  dLondon, UK: Dorling Kindersley Limited. 


7  Barry Prizant discusses this technique in a vlog on his website specifically for teachers: Barry Prizant, ‘Barry Shares 5 Tips for Educators’ Dr Barry M Prizant, PhD CCC-SLP: Barry shares 5 Tips for Educators (3 min) . Last Accessed 16 June 2025.  


8  ‘Autistic Brain Differences in Learning’ Teacher Toolkit: Autistic Brain Differences in Learning - TeacherToolkit.  Last Accessed 13 June 2025.  


9  Barry Prizant discusses this technique in a vlog on his website specifically for teachers: Barry Prizant, ‘Barry Shares 5 Tips for Educators’ Dr Barry M Prizant, PhD CCC-SLP: Barry shares 5 Tips for Educators (3 min) . Last Accessed 16 June 2025.  


10  Here are some online resources geared toward supporting GLPs of any age:  ‘General Strategies for Gestalte Language Processors of Any Age.’  General strategies for gestalt language processors - Resource Library - Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust (last access 23 June 2025) and ‘Middle, High School and Young Adult Gestalt Language Processors’ Middle, High School and Young Adult Gestalt Language Processors (last accessed 23 June 2025).  


11  Marge Blanc, ‘The Natural Language Acquisition Guide: ‘Echolalia’ is all about gestalt language development’ on www.communicationdevelopmentcenter.com.  Last revised 14 January, 2024 and last accessed 16 June, 2025.   


12  ‘Self Regulation and Executive Function,’ EEFEEF | Self-Regulation and Executive Function. Last Accessed 13 June, 2025.  


 

Monday, 16 June 2025

The joy of making curriculum choices in English

By Seb Collett

Being the Director of Learning for English, I firmly believe I have the most interesting job in the school, and part of that is due to the selection of texts. While for some subjects the National Curriculum makes all the decisions for you, for English the texts we hone our students’ skills on is a topic of constant discussion, so I thought it might be interesting to show you my thinking on some examples.


For KS5 the key word is breadth; there is a huge range of text we can choose, and all the middle leaders in English before me have come up with a fantastic curriculum, including the troubling novel The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With The Sea, the horror movie Get Out, and the graphic memoir Persepolis. Ultimately we have to think about what will bring a new vantage to our students. Due to the IB often being comparative, it is interesting to match up texts. I particularly love comparing Tennessee Williams's A Streetcar Named Desire and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe. They are so thematically similar, while being created in such different epochs with radically different purposes.


KS4 is more focused on the GCSEs, and so we have a small range of texts to choose from. And with that exam focus, we chose Macbeth over Romeo and Juliet: both are brilliant plays, but Macbeth has much stronger context to write about. An Inspector Calls also has good context, but the reason it is taught year after year is its popularity with the students. They love to argue who is most to blame for Eva’s death, and with increasing inequality in the UK, it is a text that becomes more and more relevant as time goes on.


KS3 - this is where it gets fun. We have so much freedom to mix and match. For instance, we study the classic myths in a pacey, feminist retelling with Burton’s Medusa. We use A Monster Calls to explore the very challenging issues of grief. Of Mice and Men was a regular text, once a staple of the GCSEs, then when that was scrapped moved to KS3 in pretty much every school in the country. But students and teachers over the last 5 years have become more and more vocal about the unacceptability of the language. And so we replaced it with Ugly Dogs Don’t Cry, an adaptation set around Westbourne Grove, and we can invite the writer to talk to our Year 9s every year. And while A View from a Bridge has some of the best dialogue written in the English language, we replaced it with the play of Small Island, so making the same themes of immigration and forbidden love more relevant to the experiences of Londoners.

And it is not over. We are always thinking about how we will use the terribly precious resource of time to select a new text and ready it for our students. What will we choose next year? Will the unpopular A Christmas Carol get cut? What new texts will be introduced to IB Literature?

What do you feel students should be reading in school?


Tuesday, 3 June 2025

“But I don’t know what to do!” - reducing cognitive overload

By Michelle Chen


Picture this: 

Sarah is in Science, struggling to understand the task she is supposed to be doing. She tried to listen to her teacher’s explanation, but couldn’t remember what the empirical formula is or how to calculate it. 


So, she has lost track of time, and halfway through the explanation, the diagram has now been replaced by a timer. The worksheet is in front of her, filled with questions, paragraphs of text to read and some diagrams. Sarah does not know where to look and feels like giving up. 


Does this scenario sound familiar to you?


It is a common classroom experience that many students may struggle with. However, for Sarah, there may be more underlying barriers that their peers do not have. I recently read an article from the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) about cognitive load theory that can help us understand the barriers that pupils may be facing. 


Cognitive load theory is primarily concerned with how information is efficiently and effectively encoded into learners’ long-term memory. For education, cognitive load theory refers to how teachers can manage and process tasks to significantly improve learning and memory. 


How memories are constructed: 


Here are a few cognitive science principles from could help teachers refine their teaching practice: 

  • Supporting Sarah to remember key prior learning 

  • Helping Sarah understand the explanation of the new content 

  • Supporting Sarah to fully access the task they have been given 



How to apply cognitive load theory principles to improve learning outcomes: 


  1. Spaced learning: 

Distributing learning and retrieval opportunities over a longer period rather than concentrating them in ‘massed practice’. For example, spacing the concept across days or lessons, and spacing within a lesson. 


  1. Retrieval practice

Using a variety of strategies to recall information from memory, for example, flash cards, practice tests or quizzing, or mind mapping. The hurdle Sarah faced was retrieving the key term that was previously taught, she couldn’t remember the definition of empirical formula. 

Regularly retrieving and checking understanding of core concepts throughout a topic or lesson can strengthen the memory of the information. 


  1. Manage cognitive load

A key challenge for educators is that working memory is limited.  


Three practices that can help teachers manage cognitive load are: 

  1. Using worked examples to support learners in applying and developing knowledge. 

  2. Provide scaffolding and other forms of support, such as prompts or targeted instructions, to help learners navigate the working memory demands of tasks 

  3. Using collaboration between pupils so that they can share the demands of problem-solving tasks 



For example, when calculating the empirical formula. I demonstrate how to organise the information in a question within a grid format. This breaks down the steps involved in the overall calculation, helping to ensure pupils complete each step in the correct order. I always model how to use the grid correctly when teaching it to my students. 


  1. Dual coding 

Using both verbal and non-verbal information (such as words and pictures) to teach concepts, dual coding forms one part of a wider theory known as the cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML) 


Reflection Questions:

  • What strategies do you use for reducing cognitive load?

  • How do you ensure challenge is not taken away as a means of reducing cognitive load?



References: 

Ayres, P. and Paas, F., 2012. Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), pp.827-832.


Clark, R.C., Nguyen, F. and Sweller, J., 2011. Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. John Wiley & Sons.


Perry, T., Lea, R., Jørgensen, C. R., Cordingley, P., Shapiro, K., & Youdell, D. (2021). Cognitive Science in the Classroom. London: Education Endowment Foundation (EEF).